No15

Judgment of virtue and vice is made by whole consciousness and unconsciousness.

"Consciousness" is not making judgment of virtue and vice independently.

The "mind" to which consciousness and unconsciousness were joined is performing it.

The rate for which it accounts to "mind" has "more unconsciousnesses" overwhelmingly than "consciousness."

However "consciousness" may judge that it is the "virtue", if "unconsciousness" judges it as "vice", in a general case, it will become as judgment of "unconsciousness."

"It is right that I am doing."

However the ego may be convinced so

It will become "a bad matter" if unconsciousness denies it.

Then, to what case does "unconsciousness" judge virtue and vice?

This can be put in another way as follows.

"What case does unconsciousness keep "mind" normal?

And what case does it drive into a pathological change? "

We assume "virtue" to be a convenient state to life maintenance activities of the self.

"The phenomenon in which a judgment system becomes unusual" results in "death", when the worst.

This phenomenon will happen comparatively simply.

This place,

we consider the case of the person who continues to steal a train ride in a commuter train.

It is an vice deed clearly to steal a train ride.

Therefore, he feels guilt at first.

His judgment system operates.

It is warned that it should stop his vice action.

In order to disregard the warning and to perform a pipe, consciousness must make the standard of a judgment system change.

"A railroad fare is too high."

or

"Many people are doing it."

Such a reason is considered,

they achieve self-justification.

In this way, he continues the stealing a train ride,

his guilt disappears.

It is this stage,

this judgment system becomes unusual.

If it becomes like this

unless this judgment system is reformed,

a state disadvantageous to his flesh continues,

his immunity power continues declining.

Such a phenomenon,

"Since the defect was in unconsciousness from the first, it occurred."

That is not right and we consider as follows.

"Unconsciousness is operating it so that such a result may be brought intentionally."

To consider so is more rational.

Because, if the defect was included in unconsciousness from the first, it will be against the law of natural selection.

If rare accidental results are not repeated persistently,

There is almost no possibility that the gene with a serious defect is saved till present.

Unconsciousness has the judgment standard to which priority is given over survival of itself.

We should take into consideration so.