No26

How should we just interpret the unfair realities by the character difference?

If the above explanation is given, there will also be many people who have the comment which something cannot accept held.

"He gains a sly and selfish person and he is further promised to a long life.

The noble-minded person is continuously exposed to the crisis of early death to it.

"Isn't it unfairness too much now?"

It may be the contents to say.

If we have the generous feeling of consoling the weak, we will not have such an antipathy.

However, there are not many people of a mental state who have realized so much.

"It exists also in the world after death,

I can be convinced if the person who rendered the vicious limitation in this world falls to hell in the next world."

Thus, there may be some persons who consider.

"What do I become, after dying?"

Now, as for taking out the exact answer to this question, nobody can do.

It seems that there are many ideas of the position of affirming the world after death by religion.

On the other hand, science takes the position of materialism in principle.

Supposing there is world after death, we also have to affirm existence of the spirit.

"What thing is the spirit?"

"What thing is a life?"

We cannot discuss "mind" without having a clear view to these two questions.

Then, it is at following chapter 2,

We consider the origin of a life.

In Chapter 3,

We make it consider what thing mind is.